Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?

By Meredith Blake, The Nation. Posted August 15, 2008.


As print journalism faces extinction, tabloids obsess over celebrity pregnancy and childbirth. What's wrong with this picture?
Advertisement

Last week, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and their newborn twins appeared on the cover of People magazine in a carefully staged portrait of domestic bliss: mom in a demure nightgown, a baby nestled in each arm, dad gazing lovingly over her shoulder. Inside, a nineteen-page "family album," features various combinations of Pitt, Jolie and their six children in seemingly spontaneous poses. People -- along with a UK tabloid, Hello! -- reportedly paid a combined $14 million for exclusive rights to the pictures, the most ever paid for celebrity photos.

This eclipses the previous record of a reported $4.1 million paid for the first images of Jolie and Pitt's other biological child, Shiloh, born in 2006. Although the pair donates all the proceeds from these sales to charity, it seems absurd that in the intervening two years, as the real estate market has collapsed, the price of oil has skyrocketed and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan drag on, the apparent value of a few baby pictures would appreciate so wildly -- especially when the price was already obscene.

And the Jolie-Pitts are not alone. While most of us can barely feign interest in pictures of a co-worker's baby, B-lister Matthew McConaughey, his unfamous girlfriend and their baby boy were on the cover of last week's OK!. Their pictures reportedly went for $3 million. A few months before that, Nicole Richie sold her baby pictures for a reported $1 million. At just a few weeks of age, these babies have already earned more than many Americans will make in a lifetime. Talk about consolidation of wealth.

Meanwhile, one of the key "beats" -- if you can call it that -- of the celebrity weeklies is the "bump watch," a chronicle of every aspect of a starlet's pregnancy and the corresponding weight gain. The very moment she appears looking slightly heavier than usual, the pregnancy rumors swirl. If it turns out that the given celebrity is not just over-indulging at lunch, the reporting continues unabated until the "bump" is actually born. Soon after, the inevitable first pictures arrive (either courtesy of paparazzi or through more respectable channels.) Finally, the mother's baby weight miraculously disappears, spawning yet another news item. A cursory glance at any of the celebrity weeklies would suggest that the American public has a boundless appetite for "bump" news. Consider the following recent headlines: "Hollywood Baby Horoscopes," "Real-Life Hollywood Moms," "Bodies Bounce Back After Baby," "Summer Bumps" and, yes, even "Baby Bumps for Obama," chronicling pregnant celebs at a political fundraiser.

Baby fever is spilling over into other forms of media. The most talked-about mainstream comedies of the past two years were Juno and Knocked Up, films that irreverently addressed the issue of unexpected pregnancy to great financial and critical success.

On the small screen, the baby trend is also gaining steam, although within a much more conservative framework. The most popular show on cable this summer is ABC Family Channel's The Secret Life of the American Teenager, a drama chronicling the unexpected pregnancy of a 15-year-old "good girl" -- like Juno, but without any of the spark or wit. The show's creator, Brenda Hampton, is also responsible for the insipid 7th Heaven, a drama about a minister and his family. Meanwhile, on the reality front, there's also a cottage industry of cable TV reality shows following the lives of extremely large families. TLC has John and Kate Plus 8, about a family with a set of twins and a septuplets; while Discovery Health has a crop of specials based on the ever-expanding Duggar family, including The Duggar's Big Family Album and On the Road with 16 Children. Although the producers strain to depict the Duggars as a relatively average American family, they are in fact right-wing Christian extremists, part of an expansionist movement Kathryn Joyce has chronicled in The Nation and other publications.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: celebrity, babies, birth

Meredith Blake is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn. She has written for the New York Daily News, Glamour and Men's Journal.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Plan is simple...
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 16, 2008 7:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bombard people with meaningless nonsense in order for the people to focus on things that are meaningless. This includes:
- Sports
- Celebrities
- Fashion
- Other Pop Culture
- Music Videos/ Movies/ Advertisements that keep people hypnotized

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Plan is simple... Posted by: mmckinl
The Nation, also, should know better ...
Posted by: realmuzik on Aug 17, 2008 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... than to publish stories like this one so that Alternet won't pick them up to waste space that is more needed for real life issues that urgently need to be featured and discussed here.

Don't get me wrong. I love to be entertained, but not by the crop of people who constantly grace the covers of the tabloids clogging the check-out racks of a Wal-Mart near you. These "A-listers" are absolutely, positively talentless! and deserve to be "Z-listers," at best. They are controlled by a corporate culture that only cares about America 's so-called "demand" for celebrity news and shoving it down our throats. It's pretty obvious. Corporations do not want for us progressive-minded folks to care about THEIR problems. Go figure ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's what's going on. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 18, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .The news has been cancelled, for lack of interest.

Undereducate and underinform the public for long enough, and sooner or later, the public becomes so ... what's the word I'm looking for? ...DUMB ... as to not know that they don't know what they should know. So, they sink back to what has been the "tried-and-true" since primative times: family and reproduction. What is so pathetic is that this is where we find ourselves in the technological 21st century, with species-ending problems staring us right in the face.

It's "mission accomplished" for the greedy, evangelical, creationist anti-science crowd, but curtains for the rest of us -- except for all those trust fund aristo-brats peppering the pop-culture landscape.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

print media going extinct?... good!
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 22, 2008 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope all MSM outlets go bankrupt, and soon! Then just maybe, we will get proper investigative reporting and no more infotainment passing as real investigative news reporting when in fact, Max Headrooms all over the tube steal snippets of real reporting for their clammy MSM supported news infotainment hour they've been assigned!

I'm so tired of all the talking heads on TV that I don't even bother with it/them anymore!
I'm sure I'm not alone here

nuff said
JDFU

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: print media going extinct?... good! Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
They're trying to make having babies seem cool
Posted by: wagadog on Aug 25, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...instead of the ecologically and economically insupportable activity it really is--on any scale.

In other news, a generation of impoverished single mums get into such deep debt -- hospital bills from the beatings from the methlab boyfriend -- that their malnourished sons raised on video games are given no choice but to either go to war or watch their own mothers starve.

Welcome to America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Babies Are...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 25, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
accessories. Fresh take on the old standby: the ONLY path to immortality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The corporate media is putting itself out of business
Posted by: jjohn9357 on Sep 4, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently the corporate media is trying to put itself out of business. If people stop believing or trusting the news, they will stop buying newspapers, looking at the news on television, and paying attention to what is really happening. People will occupy their time with "Dancing With The Stars" and "American Idol". Before you know it, America's Bill of Rights will be no more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]